↓ Skip to main content

A precision medicine approach to pharmacological adjuncts to extinction: a call to broaden research

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A precision medicine approach to pharmacological adjuncts to extinction: a call to broaden research
Published in
Psychopharmacology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00213-018-4999-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabrielle King, Kathryn D. Baker, Madelyne A. Bisby, Diana Chan, Caitlin S. M. Cowan, Anthea A. Stylianakis, Kelsey S. Zimmermann, Rick Richardson

Abstract

There is a pressing need to improve treatments for anxiety. Although exposure-based therapy is currently the gold-standard treatment, many people either do not respond to this therapy or experience a relapse of symptoms after treatment has ceased. In recent years, there have been many novel pharmacological agents identified in preclinical research that have potential as adjuncts for exposure therapy, yet very few of these are regularly integrated into clinical practice. Unfortunately, the robust effects observed in the laboratory animal often do not translate to a clinical population. In this review, we discuss how age, sex, genetics, stress, medications, diet, alcohol, and the microbiome can vary across a clinical population and yet are rarely considered in drug development. While not an exhaustive list, we have focused on these factors because they have been shown to influence an individual's vulnerability to anxiety and alter the neurotransmitter systems often targeted by pharmacological adjuncts to therapy. We argue that for potential adjuncts to be successfully translated from the lab to the clinic empirical research must be broadened to consider how individual difference factors will influence drug efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 23 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 14%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 27 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,046,322
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#3,887
of 5,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,766
of 301,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#32
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.