Title |
Selfassembly of Metallic Nanoparticle Arrays by DNA Scaffolding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, August 2002
|
DOI | 10.1023/a:1021145208328 |
Authors |
Shoujun Xiao, Furong Liu, Abbey E. Rosen, James F. Hainfeld, Nadrian C. Seeman, Karin Musier-Forsyth, Richard A. Kiehl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
Professor | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 21 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 18% |
Materials Science | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#63
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,730
of 48,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.