| Title |
The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) Checklist: A Joint Statement by the ERAS® and ERAS® USA Societies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-018-4753-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin M. Elias, Alexander B. Stone, Katharine McGinigle, Jo’An I. Tankou, Michael J. Scott, William J. Fawcett, Nicolas Demartines, Dileep N. Lobo, Olle Ljungqvist, Richard D. Urman, the ERAS® Society and ERAS® USA, Kevin Elias, Maria Adamian, Frederic Bushnell, Arman Dagal, Chad Engan, Joseph Marcotte, Katharine McGinigle, Nicollete Pauksta, Venu Pillarisetty, Jo’An Tankou |
| Abstract |
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are multimodal care pathways designed to minimize the physiological and psychological impact of surgery for patients. Increased compliance with ERAS guidelines is associated with improved patient outcomes across surgical types. As ERAS programs have proliferated, an unintentional effect has been significant variation in how ERAS-related studies are reported in the literature. To improve the quality of ERAS reporting, ERAS® USA and the ERAS® Society launched an effort to create an instrument to assist authors in manuscript preparation. Criteria to include were selected by a combination of literature review and expert opinion. The final checklist was refined by group consensus. The Societies present the Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) Checklist. The tool contains 20 items including best practices for reporting clinical pathways, compliance auditing, and formatting guidelines. The RECOvER Checklist is intended to provide a standardized framework for the reporting of ERAS-related studies. The checklist can also assist reviewers in evaluating the quality of ERAS-related manuscripts. Authors are encouraged to include the RECOvER Checklist when submitting ERAS-related studies to peer-reviewed journals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 23% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 4% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 26% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,197,021
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#290
of 4,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,427
of 301,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.