↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of phytoplankton bloom dynamics by citizen scientists in urban and peri-urban environments

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Quantification of phytoplankton bloom dynamics by citizen scientists in urban and peri-urban environments
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-4912-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Pintado Castilla, Davi Gasparini Fernandes Cunha, Fred Wang Fat Lee, Steven Loiselle, Kin Chung Ho, Charlotte Hall

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are severely threatened by urban development and agricultural intensification. Increased occurrence of algal blooms is a main issue, and the identification of local dynamics and drivers is hampered by a lack of field data. In this study, data from 13 cities (250 water bodies) were used to examine the capacity of trained community members to assess elevated phytoplankton densities in urban and peri-urban freshwater ecosystems. Coincident nutrient concentrations and land use observations were used to examine possible drivers of algal blooms. Measurements made by participants showed a good relationship to standard laboratory measurements of phytoplankton density, in particular in pond and lake ecosystems. Links between high phytoplankton density and nutrients (mainly phosphate) were observed. Microscale observations of pollution sources and catchment scale estimates of land cover both influenced the occurrence of algal blooms. The acquisition of environmental data by committed and trained community members represents a major opportunity to support agency monitoring programmes and to complement field campaigns in the study of catchment dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 38 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 15%
Unspecified 6 5%
Chemistry 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,528,558
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#425
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,805
of 282,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.