You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/14-1354.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Craig D. Snyder, Nathaniel P. Hitt, John A. Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 72 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,713,382
of 24,647,023 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#702
of 3,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,898
of 268,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,647,023 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.