↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacogenetic allele nomenclature: International workgroup recommendations for test result reporting

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacogenetic allele nomenclature: International workgroup recommendations for test result reporting
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/cpt.280
Pubmed ID
Authors

L V Kalman, Jag Agúndez, M Lindqvist Appell, J L Black, G C Bell, S Boukouvala, C Bruckner, E Bruford, K Caudle, S A Coulthard, A K Daly, Al Del Tredici, J T den Dunnen, K Drozda, R E Everts, D Flockhart, R R Freimuth, A Gaedigk, H Hachad, T Hartshorne, M Ingelman-Sundberg, T E Klein, V M Lauschke, D R Maglott, H L McLeod, G A McMillin, U A Meyer, D J Müller, D A Nickerson, W S Oetting, M Pacanowski, V M Pratt, M V Relling, A Roberts, W S Rubinstein, K Sangkuhl, M Schwab, S A Scott, S C Sim, R K Thirumaran, L H Toji, R F Tyndale, Rhn van Schaik, M Whirl-Carrillo, Ktj Yeo, U M Zanger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 23%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Other 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 8%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,898,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#291
of 4,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,362
of 398,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#8
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.