↓ Skip to main content

Agronomic factors affect powdery scab of potato and amounts of Spongospora subterranea DNA in soil

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Plant Pathology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Agronomic factors affect powdery scab of potato and amounts of Spongospora subterranea DNA in soil
Published in
Australasian Plant Pathology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13313-014-0317-4
Authors

Farhat A. Shah, Richard E. Falloon, Ruth C. Butler, Ros A. Lister, Steve M. Thomas, Denis Curtin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Colombia 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 67%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Plant Pathology
#71
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,823
of 249,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Plant Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.