↓ Skip to main content

Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 1979
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship
Published in
Scientometrics, March 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf02016308
Authors

D. deB Beaver, R. Rosen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Croatia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 105 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 27%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 42 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 10%
Computer Science 12 10%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#729
of 2,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319
of 5,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them