↓ Skip to main content

The role of astrocytes in the progression of brain cancer: complicating the picture of the tumor microenvironment

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
The role of astrocytes in the progression of brain cancer: complicating the picture of the tumor microenvironment
Published in
Tumor Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-4242-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda L. Placone, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, Peter C. Searson

Abstract

Gliomas and brain-metastatic tumors contribute to hundreds of thousands of deaths every year. Typical survival times for brain cancer patients, even with surgical, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment, remain very low despite advances in treatment. In brain cancers, astrocytes, which comprise approximately 50 % of the cells in the brain, become activated, resulting in a layer of reactive astrocytes surrounding the tumor. This process of reactive gliosis, which involves the secretion of growth factors and cytokines, helps repair injury in the brain, but also plays a role in disease progression. In this review, we survey the mechanisms by which astrocytes modulate the local tumor microenvironment, enhancing proliferation, invasion, chemoprotection, and immunoprotection of tumor cells. Consideration of the effect of astrocytes and reactive gliosis in in vitro and in vivo assays may allow us to obtain a more complete picture of the interactions occurring at the tumor microenvironment, which will provide additional insight into potential pathways that can be targeted by brain cancer therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 26%
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 19%
Neuroscience 24 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,488,722
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#61
of 2,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,246
of 290,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#3
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.