| Title |
Virus preparations from the mixed-infected P70 Pinot Noir accession exhibit GLRaV-1/GVA ‘end-to-end’ particles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-018-3995-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Alliaume, Catherine Reinbold, Mathieu Erhardt, Monique Beuve, Jean-Michel Hily, Olivier Lemaire, Etienne Herrbach |
| Abstract |
P70 is a Pinot Noir grapevine accession that displays strong leafroll disease symptoms. A high-throughput sequencing (HTS)-based analysis established that P70 was mixed-infected by two variants of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1, genus Ampelovirus) and one of grapevine virus A (GVA, genus Vitivirus) as well as by two viroids (hop stunt viroid [HSVd] and grapevine yellow speckle viroid 1 [GYSVd1]) and four variants of grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV). Immunogold labelling using gold particles of two different diameters revealed the existence of 'hybrid' particles labelled at one end as GLRaV-1, with the rest labelled as GVA. In this work, we suggest that immunogold labelling can provide information about the biology of the viruses, going deeper than just genomic information provided by HTS, from which no recombinant or 'chimeric' GLRaV-1/GVA sequences had been identified in the dataset. Our observations suggest an unknown interaction between members of two different viral species that are often encountered together in a single grapevine, highlighting potential consequences in the vector biology and epidemiology of leafroll and rugose-wood diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 33% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,821,622
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,654
of 4,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,394
of 302,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#36
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.