| Title |
Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, November 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00223700 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. M. Arias, L. H. Rieseberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 74% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,587
of 3,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,588
of 21,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.