↓ Skip to main content

Neurosurgical training with simulators: a novel neuroendoscopy model

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Neurosurgical training with simulators: a novel neuroendoscopy model
Published in
Child's Nervous System, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00381-015-2936-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastián G. Jaimovich, Marcela Bailez, Marcelo Asprea, Roberto Jaimovich

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present a novel neuroendoscopy simulation model in live animals, with the objective of enhancing patient safety with realistic surgical training. A simulation model using live Wistar rats was designed after the approval of the Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Under anesthesia, a hydroperitoneum was created in order to simulate a cavity with mesenteric membranes and vessels, viscera, and a solid and bleeding tumor (the liver) floating in a liquid environment. For validation purposes, we evaluated trainees' basal and final skills for each neuroendoscopic procedure, and we also acknowledged trainees' and instructors' opinion on the model's realism. This model is simple and low cost effective for complete and real-life training in neuroendoscopy, with the possibility of performing all the basic and advanced endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic exploration, membrane fenestration, vessel coagulation, hematoma evacuation, and endoscopic tumor biopsy and resection using a ventricular neuroendoscopy set. Although the model does not represent human ventricular anatomy, a reliable simulation is possible in real living tissue in a liquid environment. Trainees' skills improvements were notorious. Minimally invasive endoscopic techniques require specific training. Simulation training can improve and accelerate the learning curve. The presented training model allows simulating the different neuroendoscopic procedures. We believe that due to its practical possibilities, its simplicity, low cost, reproducibility, and reality, being live animal tissue, it can be considered a fundamental model within a complete training program on neuroendoscopy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,827,133
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#878
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,631
of 283,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.