↓ Skip to main content

Children’s Mental Health and Well-Being After Parental Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Children’s Mental Health and Well-Being After Parental Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10567-015-0193-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Alisic, Revathi N. Krishna, Arend Groot, John W. Frederick

Abstract

When one parent kills the other, children are confronted with multiple losses, involving their attachment figures and their direct living environment. In these complex situations, potentially drastic decisions are made, for example, regarding new living arrangements and contact with the perpetrating parent. We aimed to synthesize the empirical literature on children's mental health and well-being after parental intimate partner homicide. A systematic search identified 17 relevant peer-reviewed articles (13 independent samples). We recorded the theoretical background, methodology, and sample characteristics of the studies, and extracted all child outcomes as well as potential risk and protective factors. Children's outcomes varied widely and included psychological, social, physical, and academic consequences (e.g., post-traumatic stress, attachment difficulties, weight and appetite changes, and drops in school grades). Potential risk and protective factors for children's outcomes included 10 categories of pre-, peri-, and post-homicide characteristics such as cultural background of the family, whether the child witnessed the homicide, and the level of conflict between the families of the victim and the perpetrator. We integrated the findings into a conceptual model of risk factors to direct clinical reflection and further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 52 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 38%
Social Sciences 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 66 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,312,328
of 25,369,304 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#61
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,275
of 294,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,369,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.