↓ Skip to main content

Phobos sample return mission: Scientific substantiation

Overview of attention for article published in Solar System Research, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 121)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Phobos sample return mission: Scientific substantiation
Published in
Solar System Research, February 2010
DOI 10.1134/s0038094610010028
Authors

E. M. Galimov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Russia 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Master 4 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 42%
Engineering 3 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 25%
Unspecified 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,411,203
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Solar System Research
#38
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,453
of 93,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Solar System Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them