↓ Skip to main content

A Semantic Big Data Platform for Integrating Heterogeneous Wearable Data in Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
A Semantic Big Data Platform for Integrating Heterogeneous Wearable Data in Healthcare
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10916-015-0344-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emna Mezghani, Ernesto Exposito, Khalil Drira, Marcos Da Silveira, Cédric Pruski

Abstract

Advances supported by emerging wearable technologies in healthcare promise patients a provision of high quality of care. Wearable computing systems represent one of the most thrust areas used to transform traditional healthcare systems into active systems able to continuously monitor and control the patients' health in order to manage their care at an early stage. However, their proliferation creates challenges related to data management and integration. The diversity and variety of wearable data related to healthcare, their huge volume and their distribution make data processing and analytics more difficult. In this paper, we propose a generic semantic big data architecture based on the "Knowledge as a Service" approach to cope with heterogeneity and scalability challenges. Our main contribution focuses on enriching the NIST Big Data model with semantics in order to smartly understand the collected data, and generate more accurate and valuable information by correlating scattered medical data stemming from multiple wearable devices or/and from other distributed data sources. We have implemented and evaluated a Wearable KaaS platform to smartly manage heterogeneous data coming from wearable devices in order to assist the physicians in supervising the patient health evolution and keep the patient up-to-date about his/her status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 37 18%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 72 35%
Engineering 16 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 61 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,866,950
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#70
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,139
of 287,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.