↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi‐breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Genetics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi‐breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle
Published in
Animal Genetics, October 2015
DOI 10.1111/age.12362
Pubmed ID
Authors

M M Farah, A A Swan, M R S Fortes, R Fonseca, S S Moore, M J Kelly

Abstract

Genomic selection is becoming a standard tool in livestock breeding programs, particularly for traits that are hard to measure. Accuracy of genomic selection can be improved by increasing the quantity and quality of data and potentially by improving analytical methods. Adding genotypes and phenotypes from additional breeds or crosses often improves the accuracy of genomic predictions but requires specific methodology. A model was developed to incorporate breed composition estimated from genotypes into genomic selection models. This method was applied to age at puberty data in female beef cattle (as estimated from age at first observation of a corpus luteum) from a mix of Brahman and Tropical Composite beef cattle. In this dataset, the new model incorporating breed composition did not increase the accuracy of genomic selection. However, the breeding values exhibited slightly less bias (as assessed by deviation of regression of phenotype on genomic breeding values from the expected value of 1). Adding additional Brahman animals to the Tropical Composite analysis increased the accuracy of genomic predictions and did not affect the accuracy of the Brahman predictions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,436,358
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Animal Genetics
#724
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,238
of 288,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Genetics
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.