↓ Skip to main content

Sex does not sell: the argument for using the terms “anamorph” and “teleomorph” for fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Sex does not sell: the argument for using the terms “anamorph” and “teleomorph” for fungi
Published in
Mycological Progress, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11557-018-1421-6
Authors

Roland Kirschner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,543,612
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#458
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,173
of 329,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.