| Title |
Local biologicals and the politics of standardization: Making ethical pluripotent stem cells in the United Kingdom and Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioSocieties, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1057/biosoc.2015.35 |
| Authors |
Koichi Mikami, Neil Stephens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,832,536
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#49
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,592
of 286,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.