| Title |
Identifying and quantifying urban recharge: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrogeology Journal, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10040-001-0177-1 |
| Authors |
David N. Lerner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 376 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 17% |
| Researcher | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 104 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 101 | 26% |
| Engineering | 66 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 87 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#156
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,420
of 133,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.