↓ Skip to main content

Mineralocorticoid Receptors, Neuroinflammation and Hypertensive Encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Mineralocorticoid Receptors, Neuroinflammation and Hypertensive Encephalopathy
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10571-018-0610-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Elvira Brocca, Luciana Pietranera, Edo Ronald de Kloet, Alejandro Federico De Nicola

Abstract

Worldwide, raised blood pressure is estimated to affect 35-40% of the adult population and is a main conditioning factor for cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Animal models of hypertension have provided great advances concerning the pathophysiology of human hypertension, as already shown for the deoxycorticosterone-salt treated rat, the Dahl-salt sensitive rat, the Zucker obese rat and the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). SHR has been widely used to study abnormalities of the brain in chronic hypertension. This review summarises present and past evidence that in the SHR, hypertension causes hippocampal tissue damage which triggers a pro-inflammatory feedforward cascade affecting this vulnerable brain region. The cascade is driven by mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation responding to endogenous corticosterone rather than aldosterone. Increased MR expression is a generalised feature of the SHR which seems to support first the rise in blood pressure. Then oxidative stress caused by vasculopathy and hypoxia further increases MR activation in hippocampal neurons and glia cells, activates microglia activation and pro-inflammatory mediators, and down-regulates anti-inflammatory factors. In contrast to MR, involvement of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in SHR is less certain. GR showed normal expression levels and blockage with an antagonist failed to reduce blood pressure of SHR. The findings support the concept that MR:GR imbalance caused by vasculopathy causes a switch in MR function towards a proverbial "death" receptor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#849
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,982
of 304,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.