| Title |
Constructing event trees for volcanic crises
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004450100173 |
| Authors |
C. Newhall, R. Hoblitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 135 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,706,570
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#226
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,181
of 123,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them