↓ Skip to main content

UHRF1 regulation of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway in pancreatic cancer contributes to oncogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Pathology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
UHRF1 regulation of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway in pancreatic cancer contributes to oncogenesis
Published in
The Journal of Pathology, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/path.4665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wafa Abu-Alainin, Thompson Gana, Triantafillos Liloglou, Adedamola Olayanju, Lawrence N Barrera, Robert Ferguson, Fiona Campbell, Timothy Andrews, Christopher Goldring, Neil Kitteringham, Brian K Park, Taoufik Nedjadi, Michael C Schmid, Joseph R Slupsky, William Greenhalf, John P Neoptolemos, Eithne Costello

Abstract

The cellular defence protein Nrf2 is a mediator of oncogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other cancers. However, the control of Nrf2 expression and activity in cancer is not fully understood. We previously reported absence of Keap1, a pivotal regulator of Nrf2, in ~70 % of PDAC cases. Here we describe a novel mechanism whereby the epigenetic regulator UHRF1 suppresses Keap1 protein levels. UHRF1 expression was observed in 20% (5/25) of benign pancreatic ducts compared to 86% (114 of 132) of pancreatic tumours, and an inverse relationship between UHRF1 and Keap1 levels in PDAC tumours (n=124) was apparent (p=0.002). We also provide evidence that UHRF1-mediated regulation of the Nrf2 pathway contributes to the aggressive behaviour of PDAC. Depletion of UHRF1 from PDAC cells decreased growth, enhanced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. UHRF1 depletion also led to reduced levels of Nrf2-regulated downstream proteins and was accompanied by heightened oxidative stress, in the form of lower glutathione levels and increased reactive oxygen species. Concomitant depletion of Keap1 and UHRF1 restored Nrf2 levels and reversed cell cycle arrest and the increase in reactive oxygen species. Mechanistically, depletion of UHRF1 reduced global and tumour suppressor promoter methylation in pancreatic cancer cell lines and KEAP1 gene promoter methylation was reduced in one of three cell lines examined. Thus, methylation of the KEAP1 gene promoter may contribute to the suppression of Keap1 protein levels by UHRF1, although our data suggest that additional mechanisms need to be explored. Finally, we demonstrate that KRas drives UHRF1 expression, establishing a novel link between this oncogene and Nrf2-mediated cellular protection. Since UHRF1 overexpression occurs in other cancers, its ability to regulate the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway may be critically important to the malignant behaviour of these cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,827,133
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Pathology
#2,237
of 2,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,371
of 387,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Pathology
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.