↓ Skip to main content

Review of the Uses of Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Review of the Uses of Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11916-015-0528-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishnan Chakravarthy, Hira Chaudhry, Kayode Williams, Paul J. Christo

Abstract

Recent human and animal studies provide growing evidence that vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can deliver strong analgesic effects in addition to providing therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of refractory epilepsy and depression. Analgesia is potentially mediated by vagal afferents that inhibit spinal nociceptive reflexes and transmission and have strong anti-inflammatory properties. The purpose of this review is to provide pain practitioners with an overview of VNS technology and limitations. It specifically focuses on clinical indications of VNS for various chronic pain syndromes, including fibromyalgia, pelvic pain, and headaches. We also present potential mechanisms for VNS modulation of chronic pain by reviewing both animal and human studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 17 8%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 68 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 22%
Neuroscience 21 10%
Engineering 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 82 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,524,816
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#66
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,817
of 288,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them