| Title |
What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander. Guiding Principles for the Use of Financial Incentives in Health Behaviour Change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12529-011-9202-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marita C. Lynagh, Rob W. Sanson-Fisher, Billie Bonevski |
| Abstract |
The use of financial incentives or pay-for-performance programs for health care providers has triggered emerging interest in the use of financial incentives for encouraging health behaviour change. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Denmark | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 18% |
| Psychology | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,062,549
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#86
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,169
of 242,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.