↓ Skip to main content

Does carbon emissions trading affect the financial performance of high energy-consuming firms in China?

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Does carbon emissions trading affect the financial performance of high energy-consuming firms in China?
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3434-5
Authors

Yue-Jun Zhang, Jing-Yue Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 26 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 27 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,647,365
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#282
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,439
of 333,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.