↓ Skip to main content

Review of comparative studies on market mechanisms for carbon emission reduction: a bibliometric analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Review of comparative studies on market mechanisms for carbon emission reduction: a bibliometric analysis
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3445-2
Authors

Xiang-Yu Wang, Bao-Jun Tang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,624,376
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#122
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,494
of 332,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.