↓ Skip to main content

LIS1-associated classic lissencephaly: A retrospective, multicenter survey of the epileptogenic phenotype and response to antiepileptic drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Brain & Development, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LIS1-associated classic lissencephaly: A retrospective, multicenter survey of the epileptogenic phenotype and response to antiepileptic drugs
Published in
Brain & Development, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia M. Herbst, Christiane R. Proepper, Tobias Geis, Ingo Borggraefe, Andreas Hahn, Otfried Debus, Martin Haeussler, Gero von Gersdorff, Gerhard Kurlemann, Matthias Ensslen, Nathalie Beaud, Joerg Budde, Michael Gilbert, Ralf Heiming, Rita Morgner, Heike Philippi, Sophia Ross, Gertrud Strobl-Wildemann, Kerstin Muelleder, Paul Vosschulte, Deborah J. Morris-Rosendahl, Gerhard Schuierer, Ute Hehr

Abstract

Patients with LIS1-associated classic lissencephaly typically present with severe psychomotor retardation and drug-resistant epilepsy within the first year. To analyze the epileptogenic phenotype and response to antiepileptic therapy in LIS1-associated classic lissencephaly. Retrospective evaluation of 22 patients (8months-24years) with genetically and radiologically confirmed LIS1-associated classic lissencephaly in 16 study centers. All patients in our cohort developed drug-resistant epilepsy. In 82% onset of seizures was noted within the first six months of life, most frequently with infantile spasms. Later in infancy the epileptogentic phenotype became more variable and included different forms of focal seizures as well generalized as tonic-clonic seizures, with generalized tonic-clonic seizures being the predominant type. Lamotrigine and valproate were rated most successful with good or partial response rates in 88-100% of the patients. Both were evaluated significantly better than levetiracetam (p<0.05) and sulthiame (p<0.01) in the neuropediatric assessment and better than levetiracetam, sulthiame (p<0.05) and topiramate (p<0.01) in the family survey. Phenobarbital and vigabatrin achieved good or partial response in 62-83% of the patients. Our findings suggest that patients with LIS1-associated lissencephaly might benefit most from lamotrigine, valproate, vigabatrin or phenobarbital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brain & Development
#514
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,650
of 295,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain & Development
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.