↓ Skip to main content

Bivalirudin for left ventricular assist device thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Bivalirudin for left ventricular assist device thrombosis
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11239-018-1725-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip Weeks, Adam Sieg, Indranee Rajapreyar, Sriram Nathan, Marwan Jumean, Manish Patel, Rajko Radovancevic, Biswajit Kar, Igor Gregoric

Abstract

Pump thrombosis remains a serious complication of implantable ventricular assist device therapy and is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Optimal management strategies remain controversial and are guided largely by limited literature and expert opinion. Medical management of pump thrombosis, including the use of direct thrombin inhibitors, has been associated with mixed results. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes associated with bivalirudin therapy in LVAD patients with suspected pump thrombosis. A single-center, retrospective observational study of 15 patients with suspected pump thrombosis that were all treated with bivalirudin therapy was conducted. The majority of subjects' initial treatment courses were unsuccessful [9/15 (60%)]; however, 6/15 (40%) achieved an initial improvement in serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and were stabilized to be successfully discharged from the hospital. Of the subjects discharged, there was a high rate of recurrence of pump thrombosis within 6 months [5/6 (83.3%)]. Bivalirudin therapy was not associated with a consistent reduction in LDH among all subjects studied, and clinical responses to therapy appear to be associated with high rates of thrombosis recurrence. This study analyzes the largest cohort to date of LVAD patients with pump thrombosis treated with bivalirudin therapy, and suggests that alternative therapies should be considered in management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Engineering 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%