↓ Skip to main content

Suboptimal Retention in Care Among Recently Released Prisoners: Implications for Social Workers in HIV Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Suboptimal Retention in Care Among Recently Released Prisoners: Implications for Social Workers in HIV Primary Care
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10461-018-2254-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Murphree, D. Scott Batey, Emma Sophia Kay, Andrew O. Westfall, Michael J. Mugavero

Abstract

Certain populations of people living with HIV (PLWH) are at greater risk for falling out of care, including PLWH with a history of incarceration. This is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. In the current retrospective cohort study, we examined patient-level information for 340 PLWH who had transferred HIV care services from prison or from other community-based or private HIV primary care providers to a large urban HIV clinic in the southeastern United States. Results indicated that, compared to those transferring care from another community-based or private medical provider, PLWH transferring care from prison were significantly less likely to be retained in care than PLWH transferring care from other providers, even after controlling for other factors. HIV primary care social workers, who are trained to provide case management services, can help provide PLWH with a coordinated continuum of care that addresses the complex issues faced post-release.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Psychology 6 12%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,846,517
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#721
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,872
of 334,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#14
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.