↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia and Dark Adaptation in Diabetic Retinopathy: Interactions, Consequences, and Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
25 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Hypoxia and Dark Adaptation in Diabetic Retinopathy: Interactions, Consequences, and Therapy
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11892-015-0686-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Ramsey, G. B. Arden

Abstract

In diabetes, retinal blood flow is compromised, and retinal hypoxia is likely to be further intensified during periods of darkness. During dark adaptation, rod photoreceptors in the outer retina are maximally depolarized and continuously release large amounts of the neurotransmitter glutamate-an energetically demanding process that requires the highest oxygen consumption per unit volume of any tissue of the body. In complete darkness, even more oxygen is consumed by the outer retina, producing a steep fall in the retinal oxygen tension curve which reaches a nadir at the depth of the mitochondrial-rich rod inner segments. In contrast to the normal retina, the diabetic retina cannot meet the added metabolic load imposed by the dark-adapted rod photoreceptors; this exacerbates retinal hypoxia and stimulates the overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The use of nocturnal illumination to prevent dark adaptation, specifically reducing the rod photoreceptor dark current, should ameliorate diabetic retinopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 5 9%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,897,330
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#394
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,173
of 290,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.