↓ Skip to main content

Does New Guinea cannibalism have nutritional value?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, January 1974
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Does New Guinea cannibalism have nutritional value?
Published in
Human Ecology, January 1974
DOI 10.1007/bf01507342
Authors

Mark D. Dornstreich, George E. B. Morren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Lecturer 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 41%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,172,769
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#661
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,499
of 18,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them