↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic and prognostic values of tissue hsa-miR-30c and hsa-miR-203 in prostate carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic and prognostic values of tissue hsa-miR-30c and hsa-miR-203 in prostate carcinoma
Published in
Tumor Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-4262-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ziling Huang, Long Zhang, Xianghua Yi, Xiaoting Yu

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) has become a prevalent malignant disease in males globally. Accumulating data suggested that hsa-microRNAs (miRNAs) could be potential biomarkers for tumor diagnosis due to their important roles in the cell cycle. This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic values of hsa-miR-203 and hsa-miR-30c in PCa tissues. There were 44 pathologically confirmed PCa patients who were enrolled in this study. Tissue samples were collected from both tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. RNA was extracted and the expression levels of hsa-miR-203 and hsa-miR-30c in tumor and normal tissues were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the reliability of hsa-miR-203 and hsa-miR-30c in detecting PCa. All subjects in this study were followed up by 36 months, and the Kaplan-Meier method was conducted to investigate the survival status of PCa patients. The average relative expressions of hsa-miR-203 and hsa-miR-30c in tumor tissues were significantly different from those in adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.001), and the predictive power of the two hsa-miRNAs for PCa prognosis was reliable. Besides that, the average survival times of low-hsa-miR-30c and high-hsa-miR-203 groups were significantly lower than those of the corresponding groups with the log-rank P of 0.015 and 0.023, respectively. In summary, our study suggested that both hsa-miR-203 and hsa-miR-30c are potential biomarkers for detection and prognosis of PCa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,827,133
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#969
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,961
of 283,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#58
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.