↓ Skip to main content

Multi-centre validation of an automatic algorithm for fast 4D myocardial segmentation in cine CMR datasets

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-centre validation of an automatic algorithm for fast 4D myocardial segmentation in cine CMR datasets
Published in
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, October 2015
DOI 10.1093/ehjci/jev247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandro Queirós, Daniel Barbosa, Jan Engvall, Tino Ebbers, Eike Nagel, Sebastian I. Sarvari, Piet Claus, Jaime C. Fonseca, João L. Vilaça, Jan D'hooge

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images for the assessment of global left ventricular morphology and function remains a routine task in clinical cardiology practice. To date, this process requires user interaction and therefore prolongs the examination (i.e. cost) and introduces observer variability. In this study, we sought to validate the feasibility, accuracy, and time efficiency of a novel framework for automatic quantification of left ventricular global function in a clinical setting. Analyses of 318 CMR studies, acquired at the enrolment of patients in a multi-centre imaging trial (DOPPLER-CIP), were performed automatically, as well as manually. For comparative purposes, intra- and inter-observer variability was also assessed in a subset of patients. The extracted morphological and functional parameters were compared between both analyses, and time efficiency was evaluated. The automatic analysis was feasible in 95% of the cases (302/318) and showed a good agreement with manually derived reference measurements, with small biases and narrow limits of agreement particularly for end-diastolic volume (-4.08 ± 8.98 mL), end-systolic volume (1.18 ± 9.74 mL), and ejection fraction (-1.53 ± 4.93%). These results were comparable with the agreement between two independent observers. A complete automatic analysis took 5.61 ± 1.22 s, which is nearly 150 times faster than manual contouring (14 ± 2 min, P < 0.05). The proposed automatic framework provides a fast, robust, and accurate quantification of relevant left ventricular clinical indices in 'real-world' cine CMR images.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 22%
Engineering 8 20%
Computer Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,775,656
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,441
of 2,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,863
of 283,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#22
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.