| Title |
Is reporting on interventions a weak link in understanding how and why they work? A preliminary exploration using community heart health exemplars
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-3-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara L Riley, JoAnne MacDonald, Omaima Mansi, Anita Kothari, Donna Kurtz, Linda I vonTettenborn, Nancy C Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,348,897
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,556
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,808
of 82,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.