↓ Skip to main content

Non-local rheology in dense granular flows

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal E, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Non-local rheology in dense granular flows
Published in
The European Physical Journal E, November 2015
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2015-15125-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Bouzid, Adrien Izzet, Martin Trulsson, Eric Clément, Philippe Claudin, Bruno Andreotti

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss the concepts of non-local rheology and fluidity, recently introduced to describe dense granular flows. We review and compare various approaches based on different constitutive relations and choices for the fluidity parameter, focusing on the kinetic elasto-plastic model introduced by Bocquet et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett 103, 036001 (2009)) for soft matter, and adapted for granular matter by Kamrin et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 178301 (2012)), and the gradient expansion of the local rheology μ(I) that we have proposed (Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 238301 (2013)). We emphasise that, to discriminate between these approaches, one has to go beyond the predictions derived from linearisation around a uniform stress profile, such as that obtained in a simple shear cell. We argue that future tests can be based on the nature of the chosen fluidity parameter, and the related boundary conditions, as well as the hypothesis made to derive the models and the dynamical mechanisms underlying their dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Vietnam 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 33%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 33%
Physics and Astronomy 16 20%
Chemical Engineering 5 6%
Materials Science 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,939,224
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#114
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,906
of 397,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.