| Title |
Hemodynamic Allostasis of Pregnant Women against the Background of Preeclampsia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10517-018-4189-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Yu. Zotova, M. L. Blagonravov, N. N. Lapaev, A. P. Denisova |
| Abstract |
We analyzed diurnal hemodynamic parameters (HR, systolic BP, and diastolic BP) recorded from two groups of edematous and preeclamptic pregnant women. The unidirectional character of changes in the control over the functional state of cardiovascular system was revealed except for the indices, which mark a pathological process: elevated diurnal BP in preeclampsia and diminished percentage of oscillation power in edematous patients. Uniformity of the regulatory changes in patients with and without arterial hypertension can be viewed as manifestation of allostasis developed by the cardiovascular system during pregnancy. In preeclampsia, the greater allostatic load was reflected by the changes in diurnal, daytime, and nighttime BP and in the circadian index calculated for HR, systolic BP, and diastolic BP. In edematous patients, elevation of allostatic load was indicated by the percentage of ultradian rhythms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Psychology | 3 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#931
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,005
of 336,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.