↓ Skip to main content

Out of body, out of space: Impaired reference frame processing in eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Out of body, out of space: Impaired reference frame processing in eating disorders
Published in
Psychiatry Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.10.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Serino, Antonios Dakanalis, Santino Gaudio, Giuseppe Carrà, Pietro Cipresso, Massimo Clerici, Giuseppe Riva

Abstract

A distorted body representation is a core symptom in eating disorders (EDs), though its mechanism is unclear. Allocentric lock theory, emphasising the role of reference frame processing in body image, suggests that ED patients may be (b)locked to an (allocentric) representation of their own body stored in long-term memory (e.g., my body is fat) that is not updated (modified) by the (real-time egocentric) perception-driven experience of the physical body. Employing a well-validated virtual reality-based procedure, relative to healthy controls, ED patients showed deficits in the ability to refer to and update a long-term stored (allocentric) representation with (egocentric) perceptual-driven inputs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 42 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research
#5,569
of 7,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,009
of 294,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research
#78
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.