↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Older Chinese Immigrants at High Risk for Osteoporosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Identifying Older Chinese Immigrants at High Risk for Osteoporosis
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2003
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20331.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane S. Lauderdale, Victoria Kuohung, Suey‐Lee Chang, Marshall H. Chin

Abstract

Data about whether Asian Americans are a high-risk or a low-risk group for osteoporosis are limited and inconsistent. Few previous studies have recognized that the heterogeneity of the Asian American population, with respect to both nativity (foreign- vs U.S.-born) and ethnicity, may be related to osteoporosis risk. To assess whether older foreign-born Chinese Americans living in an urban ethnic enclave are at high risk of osteoporosis and to refer participants at high risk for follow-up care. Cross-sectional survey and osteoporosis screening, undertaken as a collaborative project by the Chinese American Service League and researchers at the University of Chicago. Chicago's Chinatown. Four hundred sixty-nine immigrant Chinese American men and women aged 50 and older. Chinese Americans in this urban setting are generally recent immigrants from south China with limited education and resources: mean age at immigration was 54, 56% had primary only or no education, and 57% reported "fair" or "poor" self-rated health. Eighteen percent are uninsured and 55% receive Medicaid. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the calcaneus was estimated using quantitative ultrasound. Immigrant Chinese women in the study had lower average BMD than reference data for white women or U.S.-born Asian Americans. BMD for immigrant Chinese men in the study was similar to white men at ages 50 to 69, and lower at older ages. Low body mass index, low educational attainment and older age at immigration were all associated with lower BMD. Foreign-born Chinese Americans may be a high-risk group for osteoporosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Psychology 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,319,565
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,715
of 8,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,810
of 52,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.