You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between Prostinogen (KLK15) Genetic Variants and Prostate Cancer Risk and Aggressiveness in Australia and a Meta-Analysis of GWAS Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026527 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jyotsna Batra, Felicity Lose, Tracy O'Mara, Louise Marquart, Carson Stephens, Kimberly Alexander, Srilakshmi Srinivasan, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Ali Amin Al Olama, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Michelle Guy, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Aneela A. Rahman, David E. Neal, Freddie C. Hamdy, Jenny L. Donovan, Suzanne Chambers, Robert A. Gardiner, Joanne Aitken, John Yaxley, Mary-Anne Kedda, Judith A. Clements, Amanda B. Spurdle |
| Abstract |
Kallikrein 15 (KLK15)/Prostinogen is a plausible candidate for prostate cancer susceptibility. Elevated KLK15 expression has been reported in prostate cancer and it has been described as an unfavorable prognostic marker for the disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Professor | 10 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,141,030
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,467
of 193,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,087
of 239,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,500
of 2,704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.