↓ Skip to main content

A randomized, phase IIa exploratory trial to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of LEO 43204 in patients with actinic keratosis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized, phase IIa exploratory trial to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of LEO 43204 in patients with actinic keratosis
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/bjd.14245
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Sinnya, J.M. Tan, T.W. Prow, C. Primiero, E. McEniery, J. Selmer, M.L. Østerdal, H.P. Soyer

Abstract

LEO 43204 is a novel ingenol derivative in development for the treatment of actinic keratosis. To compare safety and preliminary efficacy of three doses of LEO 43204 with ingenol mebutate in actinic keratoses (AKs). Patients with at least three visible, discrete, non-keratotic AKs on four separate selected treatment areas on the forearms received LEO 43204 gel (0.025%, 0.05% and 0.075%) and ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel, by investigator-blinded randomised allocation, for 2 consecutive days. Patients were assessed at 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included maximum composite local skin response (LSR) score and adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included reduction in number of visible AKs. Forty patients completed the trial. For all treatments, mean LSR scores peaked at week 1, and were below baseline by week 8. Mean maximum composite LSR scores for LEO 43204 0.025%, 0.05% and 0.075% were 9.2 (Dunnett adjusted P = 0.017), 10.1 (Dunnett adjusted P = 0.90) and 11.2 (Dunnett adjusted P < 0.001), respectively, vs ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel (10.0). The most frequent AEs across all treatments were application site pruritus, burning sensation and tenderness. Mean reduction in number of AKs was comparable for ingenol mebutate and the two lowest doses of LEO 43204 (71.9%-73.1%) but LEO 43204 0.075% gave a significantly larger reduction (81.8%; Dunnett adjusted P=0.037). LEO 43204 had a similar safety profile to ingenol mebutate and a dose-response relationship for LSRs was demonstrated. The highest LEO 43204 dose (0.075%) significantly reduced AKs compared with ingenol mebutate. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#3,087
of 9,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,494
of 400,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#25
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.