↓ Skip to main content

Modulation of the Inflammatory Status of Macrophages and Their Paracrine Effect on the Sensitivity of Adipocytes to Insulin with Sirtuin and PPARγ Receptor Activators

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Modulation of the Inflammatory Status of Macrophages and Their Paracrine Effect on the Sensitivity of Adipocytes to Insulin with Sirtuin and PPARγ Receptor Activators
Published in
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10517-018-4186-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu. S. Stafeev, S. S. Michurina, E. S. Zubkova, I. B. Beloglazova, E. I. Ratner, E. V. Parfenova, M. Yu. Men’shikov

Abstract

We studied the effect of SIRT1 deacetylase and PPARγ receptor activators on proinflammatory (M1), anti-inflammatory (M2) polarization of RAW264.7 macrophages and their modulating effects on insulin sensitivity of adipocytes. In M1 macrophages, the expression of TNFα and CXCL9, secretion of CXCL11, ROS generation, and content of dendritic-like cells were elevated. In M2 macrophages, expression of IGF-1 and ALOX15 factors was enhanced. SIRT1 activator (DCHC) and PPARγ receptor ligand (rosiglitazone) reduced expression of inflammatory markers TNFα and CXCL9 and increased expression of IGF-1 and ALOX15. SIRT1 inhibitor Ex527 increased the proportion of dendritic cells in macrophage populations. The paracrine effect of M1-macrophage-conditioned media attenuated insulin-dependent phosphorylation of threonine (Thr308) in Akt kinase and enhanced phosphorylation of serine (Ser473). This effect was attenuated by DCHC and rosiglitazone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 3 30%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#597
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,083
of 336,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.