↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Present Status of Brugada Syndrome JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
323 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
Title
Present Status of Brugada Syndrome JACC State-of-the-Art Review
Published in
JACC, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep Brugada, Oscar Campuzano, Elena Arbelo, Georgia Sarquella-Brugada, Ramon Brugada

Abstract

The Brugada syndrome is an inherited disorder associated with risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death in a structurally normal heart. Diagnosis is based on a characteristic electrocardiographic pattern (coved type ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm followed by a negative T-wave in ≥1 of the right precordial leads V1 to V2), observed either spontaneously or during a sodium-channel blocker test. The prevalence varies among regions and ethnicities, affecting mostly males. The risk stratification and management of patients, principally asymptomatic, still remains challenging. The current main therapy is an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, but radiofrequency catheter ablation has been recently reported as an effective new treatment. Since its first description in 1992, continuous achievements have expanded our understanding of the genetics basis and electrophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease. Currently, despite several genes identified, SCN5A has attracted most attention, and in approximately 30% of patients, a genetic variant may be implicated in causation after a comprehensive analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 323 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 378 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 11%
Other 37 10%
Student > Postgraduate 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Other 73 19%
Unknown 128 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 152 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#176,442
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#387
of 16,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,541
of 342,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#13
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.