↓ Skip to main content

Priority-setting, rationing and cost-effectiveness in the German health care system

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Priority-setting, rationing and cost-effectiveness in the German health care system
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11019-012-9423-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fuat S. Oduncu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Social Sciences 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,609,675
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#207
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,832
of 170,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.