↓ Skip to main content

Parallels with the Female Athlete Triad in Male Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
Title
Parallels with the Female Athlete Triad in Male Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0411-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam S. Tenforde, Michelle T. Barrack, Aurelia Nattiv, Michael Fredericson

Abstract

Participation in sports offers many health benefits to athletes of both sexes. However, subsets of both female and male athletes are at increased risk of impaired bone health and bone stress injuries. The Female Athlete Triad (Triad) is defined as the interrelationship of low energy availability (with or without disordered eating), menstrual dysfunction, and low bone mineral density. The Triad may result in health consequences, including bone stress injuries. Our review presents evidence that an analogous process may occur in male athletes. Our review of the available literature indicates that a subset of male athletes may experience adverse health issues that parallel those associated with the Triad, including low energy availability (with or without disordered eating), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and low bone mineral density. Consequently, male athletes may be predisposed to developing bone stress injuries, and these injuries can be the first presenting feature of associated Triad conditions. We discuss the evidence for impaired nutrition, hormonal dysfunction, and low bone mineral density in a subset of male athletes, and how these health issues may parallel those of the Triad. With further research into the mechanisms and outcomes of these health concerns in active and athletic men, evidence-based guidelines can be developed that result in best practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 348 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 18%
Student > Bachelor 61 17%
Researcher 24 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 62 18%
Unknown 101 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 19%
Sports and Recreations 59 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 118 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,126,052
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#965
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,736
of 295,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#26
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.