↓ Skip to main content

Human–environmental drivers and impacts of the globally extreme 2017 Chilean fires

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Human–environmental drivers and impacts of the globally extreme 2017 Chilean fires
Published in
Ambio, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1084-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. J. S. Bowman, Andrés Moreira-Muñoz, Crystal A. Kolden, Roberto O. Chávez, Ariel A. Muñoz, Fernanda Salinas, Álvaro González-Reyes, Ronald Rocco, Francisco de la Barrera, Grant J. Williamson, Nicolás Borchers, Luis A. Cifuentes, John T. Abatzoglou, Fay H. Johnston

Abstract

In January 2017, hundreds of fires in Mediterranean Chile burnt more than 5000 km2, an area nearly 14 times the 40-year mean. We contextualize these fires in terms of estimates of global fire intensity using MODIS satellite record, and provide an overview of the climatic factors and recent changes in land use that led to the active fire season and estimate the impact of fire emissions to human health. The primary fire activity in late January coincided with extreme fire weather conditions including all-time (1979-2017) daily records for the Fire Weather Index (FWI) and maximum temperature, producing some of the most energetically intense fire events on Earth in the last 15-years. Fire activity was further enabled by a warm moist growing season in 2016 that interrupted an intense drought that started in 2010. The land cover in this region had been extensively modified, with less than 20% of the original native vegetation remaining, and extensive plantations of highly flammable exotic Pinus and Eucalyptus species established since the 1970s. These plantations were disproportionally burnt (44% of the burned area) in 2017, and associated with the highest fire severities, as part of an increasing trend of fire extent in plantations over the past three decades. Smoke from the fires exposed over 9.5 million people to increased concentrations of particulate air pollution, causing an estimated 76 premature deaths and 209 additional admissions to hospital for respiratory and cardiovascular conditions. This study highlights that Mediterranean biogeographic regions with expansive Pinus and Eucalyptus plantations and associated rural depopulation are vulnerable to intense wildfires with wide ranging social, economic, and environmental impacts, which are likely to become more frequent due to longer and more extreme wildfire seasons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 270 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 67 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 58 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 8%
Engineering 15 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 88 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2023.
All research outputs
#615,839
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#73
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,024
of 343,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.