Title |
l-Menthol mouth rinse or ice slurry ingestion during the latter stages of exercise in the heat provide a novel stimulus to enhance performance despite elevation in mean body temperature
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00421-018-3970-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Owen Jeffries, Matthew Goldsmith, Mark Waldron |
Abstract |
This study investigated the effects of L-menthol mouth rinse and ice slurry ingestion on time to exhaustion, when administered at the latter stages (~ 85%) of baseline exercise duration in the heat (35 °C). Ten male participants performed four time to exhaustion (TTE) trials on a cycle ergometer at 70% Wmax. In a randomized crossover design, (1) placebo-flavored non-calorific mouth rinse, (2) L-menthol mouth rinse (0.01%), or (3) ice ingestion (1.25 g kg-1), was administered at 85% of participants' baseline TTE. Time to exhaustion, core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived effort, thermal comfort and thermal sensation were recorded. From the point of administration at 85% of baseline TTE, exercise time was extended by 1% (placebo, 15 s), 6% (L-menthol, 82 s) and 7% (ice, 108 s), relative to baseline performance (P = 0.036), with no difference between L-menthol and ice (P > 0.05). Core temperature, skin temperature, and heart rate increased with time but did not differ between conditions (P > 0.05). Thermal sensation did not differ significantly but demonstrated a large effect size (P = 0.080; [Formula: see text] = 0.260). These results indicate that both thermally cooling and non-thermally cooling oral stimuli have an equal and immediate behavioral, rather than physiological, influence on exhaustive exercise in the heat. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 39% |
Australia | 6 | 18% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 45% |
Scientists | 15 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 33 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 36 | 33% |