| Title |
Does Monitoring Matter? A Quantitative Assessment of Management Decisions from Locally-based Monitoring of Protected Areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-005-8392-z |
| Authors |
Finn Danielsen, Arne E. Jensen, Phillip A. Alviola, Danilo S. Balete, Marlynn Mendoza, Anson Tagtag, Carlo Custodio, Martin Enghoff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 343 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 104 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 142 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,456,042
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#685
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,880
of 60,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.