| Title |
Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Basic Research in Cardiology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00395-018-0696-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans Erik Bøtker, Derek Hausenloy, Ioanna Andreadou, Salvatore Antonucci, Kerstin Boengler, Sean M. Davidson, Soni Deshwal, Yvan Devaux, Fabio Di Lisa, Moises Di Sante, Panagiotis Efentakis, Saveria Femminò, David García-Dorado, Zoltán Giricz, Borja Ibanez, Efstathios Iliodromitis, Nina Kaludercic, Petra Kleinbongard, Markus Neuhäuser, Michel Ovize, Pasquale Pagliaro, Michael Rahbek-Schmidt, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, Klaus-Dieter Schlüter, Rainer Schulz, Andreas Skyschally, Catherine Wilder, Derek M. Yellon, Peter Ferdinandy, Gerd Heusch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 80 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,194,882
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#64
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,099
of 333,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them