↓ Skip to main content

Changes in the trade of bycatch species corresponding to CITES regulations: the case of dried seahorse trade in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Changes in the trade of bycatch species corresponding to CITES regulations: the case of dried seahorse trade in Thailand
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10531-018-1610-2
Authors

T.-C. Kuo, P. Laksanawimol, L. Aylesworth, S. J. Foster, A. C. J. Vincent

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 30%
Environmental Science 12 19%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,938,988
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,791
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,478
of 336,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.