↓ Skip to main content

Immunoadsorber for specific apheresis of autoantibodies in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Dermatological Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Immunoadsorber for specific apheresis of autoantibodies in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00403-015-1606-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Mersmann, Jenny Dworschak, Kristin Ebermann, Lars Komorowski, Wolfgang Schlumberger, Winfried Stöcker, Detlef Zillikens, Christian Probst, Enno Schmidt

Abstract

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering skin disease associated with autoantibodies against two hemidesmosomal proteins, BP180 (type XVII collagen) and BP230. As the pathogenic relevance of antibodies against the immunodominant NC16A domain of BP180 has been clearly demonstrated, specific removal of these antibodies should be a rational therapeutic approach. Here, we evaluated three recombinant forms of bacterially produced BP180 NC16A, a monomer, trimer, and tetramer, together with different matrices for their efficacy to specifically adsorb autoantibodies from BP plasma samples. An adsorber consisting of NC16A-trimer coupled to NHS-activated Sepharose 4 Fast Flow revealed satisfying adsorption rates and a high specificity. The NC16A-trimer adsorber was regenerable and autoclavable. It has the potential to be used for specific immunoadsorption to treat severe and refractory BP and other pemphigoid diseases associated with BP180 NC16A reactivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,447,851
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#154
of 1,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,400
of 284,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.